|
Abstract
The consortium group has
assumed that a bus transport system in Snowdonia would be of benefit to the
environment. This short
document shows that the bus system proposed would be of no benefit and most
likely, be more damaging.
Background
The table below shows the
minimum number of passengers required on a diesel bus before it is less
damaging to the environment than a diesel car with four passengers.
|
Fuel & Emissions
|
Number of passengers.
|
|
Fuel Consumption
|
19
|
|
CO2
|
19
|
|
CO
|
7
|
|
HC
|
10
|
|
NOx
|
52
|
L. Pelkmans et al1
Notice
that in terms of CO2, which affects global warming, there must be
at least 19 passengers on the bus before it is less damaging than the car. In terms of NOx
emissions, which can react to cause acid rain and ozone, then a staggering
52 passengers are required.
The
study also shows that a natural gas powered bus requires equivalent
passengers to a diesel bus when comparing fuel consumption and CO2. Lean burn natural gas buses, that
are becoming popular, increase emissions considerably. Shown below.
|
Break – even No of passengers
|
Stoichiometric Natural Gas |
Lean Burn
Natural Gas Bus
|
|
Fuel Consumption
|
24
|
27
|
|
CO2
|
18
|
19
|
|
CO
|
2
|
2
|
|
HC
|
1
|
51
|
|
NOx
|
6
|
85
|
L. Pelkmans et al1
A petrol car can be less
damaging to the environment than a diesel car as shown by the table below,
taken from UK government figures. The
numbers in the table can be compared to obtain a relative impact of each on
the environment. Looking at the
table the emission of NOx for a bus is 72 times more than that of
a petrol car hence, 72 times more damaging to the environment.
|
Type of Vehicle
|
CO |
HC
|
NOx
|
Particulates
|
|
Petrol Car
|
7
|
3
|
6
|
2
|
|
Diesel Car
|
2
|
2
|
13
|
20
|
|
Bus
|
11
|
50
|
436
|
125
|
Euro
III vehicle standards.2
From
this study it appears that neither the natural gas bus nor the diesel bus
are good alternatives to the car as they require a very high number of
passengers to be less damaging to the environment.
Conclusion
We
can conclude that the bus is not the answer to the transport problem. A bus may be advantageous where a
guaranteed number of passengers is available but not in a rural environment
where the time of day and weather conditions are critical to passenger
number wishing to travel.
The
solution to the problem lies with efficient and sustainable small transport
units and parking. The solution is the car and environmentally friendly
parking. A car becomes
efficient and sustainable when the fuel is sustainable. Bio-diesel is one such fuel. Details of the impact of bio-diesel
are given below. Well designed
and constructed car parks cause very little environmental impact.
Bio-diesel
Bio-diesel
is a fuel that can be classed as sustainable energy. The graph below shows the change in vehicle emissions when
using bio-diesel. All
emissions are reduced ranging from 10% to 100%. It is important to realise that
emissions of CO2 are reduced by 100% meaning that global warming
is not affected by Bio-diesel
J. Tickell et al3
-
L. Pelkmans et al (2000),
Emissions and fuel consumption of natural gas powered city buses versus
diesel buses in real-city traffic, Flemish institute for technical
research, Belgium.
-
http://www.roads.detr.gov.uk/cvtf/impact/3.htm
-
J. Tickell et al (1999), From
the Fryer to the Fuel Tank, Green Teach Publishing.
|