|
Cambridge Climbing and Caving Club is a long
established club of nearly 50 members. I am writing to you in my capacity
as the climbing secretary of the club at the request of the membership
present at our recent AGM, where the proposed strategy document on the
future of the park was discussed.
Whilst sympathising with the objectives and
intent of the document, there was a unanimous rejection of the proposals
pertaining to restricted parking, compulsory bus access to the hills and
the establishment of gateway 'honey pots'.
Individual members will write to you to
with their concerns, however, on behalf of the club I have tried to
summarise the points actually discussed at the AGM:
RESTRICTED PARKING WOULD NOT ACHIEVE HIGHER
SPENDING IN THE AREA
The urban conurbations of Northern England
and the Midlands have ready access Snowdonia, the Lakes and to the Peak
national parks making day trips from these areas feasible. Climbing trips
to the hills for us and for those in Greater London and the South, on the
other hand, requires at least a weekend trip. For us, it is about 5 hours
drive to the Lakes or to Snowdonia. Public transport is entirely
impractical for a weekend. Once in the area, we will spend two nights
eating and drinking out and will spend money in outdoor shops. We, along
with many others, visit Snowdonia primarily for the hills. Forced into the
proximity of shopping 'attractions' whilst making access to the hills much
less convenient for us will mean that we will simply not organise our
weekends there. It is interesting to note that the Lakes, whose business
model you clearly wish to emulate, rejected similar proposals because they
were recognised as counter productive.
SAFETY
The hills of Snowdonia can be hazardous,
especially in winter. To maximise the use of daylight hours, it is not
uncommon for people to want to start early and leave late. There was a
concern that unless buses were running nearly 24 hours, this would simply
not be possible (and it was felt that the business case for buses
certainly wasn't based on 24 hour service). Of even more concern, however,
was the possibility of having to stand and wait for a bus after a big day
in winter. Even 20 minutes standing in the rain inactive (or a further 5
miles of walking if the buses aren't running) is a recipe for hypothermia.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Restricting parking has little impact in
terms of pollution, since most driving is done to get to the national
park, not once there. There will be an impact in terms of erosion,
however, as people will be channelled to more restricted access points
such as Pen y Pass and will arrive in larger numbers in one go (literally
by the bus load).
WHAT CAN BE DONE ?
A flexible system whereby you could either
park on outskirts and bus in OR park more centrally at a price seems like
the best option. Improving public transport so that walkers and climbers
would have the option to do long linear walks and easily return to their
cars would be good. BUT, a system whereby the only way to access, say
Tryfan, was via public transport would have the opposite effect on many
walkers and climbers to that Gwynedd council predict. we would propose
that you retain some long stay parking and turn these areas into Pay &
Display areas (as is currently the case at Ogwen Cottage). This would
raise valuable funds and at least give climbers and walkers an option.
Those who wish to park 'locally' can pay a premium while those using the
P&R can pay a proportionately lower rate.
One proposals made (4.8 in the strategy
document) is to utilise roadside space in order to create 'safe cycle and
pedestrian routes'. This will at best produce a corridor alongside which
the cyclist/pedestrian will have to endure a continued stream of heavy
goods vehicles and coaches which will continue to make use of the main
road system in the area. There is no indication why visitors should be
attracted to use such developments which would offer an environment little
better than the average urban clearway. On the other hand the disused road
and rail system along the arterial routes in question could be
economically developed into cycle ways and better pedestrian routes which
would provide a realistic attraction to visitors and may actually increase
visitor numbers to the area. This particular proposal in the consultation
document provides little more than an unsustainable reason for completely
removing roadside parking along these highways.
|